1. LLMs (including ChatGPT, Google Gemini)

Category: General purpose AI.

• Not comorbidity aware, not rule-based.

• No alignment with standard frameworks like DSM-5/ICD for diagnostics.

• No foundation in standard guidelines like NICE/APA for drugs and therapy.

• Not meant for integrated care pathways.

• Broad reasoning, hallucinations.

• Can confidently generate wrong answers.

• Extremely high medico-legal risk.

Gap XYCHIATRY fills: predictable, reliable, and consistent recommendations; rule-based, structured, with safety-first.

2. Ada Health

Category: General AI Diagnostic.

• World’s leading general diagnostic AI/ML.

• Excellent UX + huge funding ($200M+).

• Weak in psychiatry, no drug logic.

• Not precise with DSM-5 aligned criteria.

• No prescription decision layer.

Gap XYCHIATRY fills: clinical psychiatric depth + comorbidity triage + drug algorithms.

3. Symptomate (Infermedica)

Category: Symptom checker.

• Strong with general diagnostics with great interface.

• Not psychiatry-specialized, no DSM-5 specificity.

• Not comorbidity-aware.

• No drug-safety module.

• No therapy/diet modules.

Gap XYCHIATRY fills: psychiatry specialization + rule-based comorbidity logic.

4. K Health

Category: Telehealth

• Scalable + AI-driven + Telehealth.

• Not standalone diagnostic.

• Uses historical data, not rule logic.

• Focused mostly on primary care.

• Psychiatry support weak.

Gap XYCHIATRY fills: domain-native (psychiatry), deeper logic, independent triage.

5. UpToDate / ClinicalKey / Medscape

Category: Medical reference.

• Authoritative, gold standard content depth.

• Not diagnostic engines, nor decision-support.

• Not customised/personalised to individual needs.

• Passive reference tools.

• No structured triage.

• No rule-based decision pathway.

Gap XYCHIATRY fills: actionable triage, rule based pathways.

6. Wysa / Woebot / Mental Health Chatbots

Category: Therapy chatbots.

• High engagement.

• No diagnostic module.

• No medication/drugs logic.

• Not clinician-facing.

Gap XYCHIATRY fills: clinical accuracy + strong alignment with DSM-5 + solid foundation in NICE/APA guidelines.

7. Osmind / TREAT / Blueprint

Category: Clinical workflow/ EHR.

• Outcome tracking & progress monitoring.

• Covers missing front-layer.

• Not diagnostic engines.

• No drug/therapy/diet algorithms.

Gap XYCHIATRY fills: front-loaded clinical decision.

Conclusion

XYCHIATRY’s core strength is that almost nobody competes directly with us in “rule-based, comorbidity-aware, psychiatry-only decision support” category.